Cognition and Affect - Let's try to disentangle them!

Oct 26, 2023 · 4 min read
An EEG participant looks at the number 23 on a monitor. Three faces beside a speaker represent positive, neutral, and negative sounds. Illustration of the EEG task with positive, neutral, and negative sounds.

Research question

Does the mental effort of a task change how the brain responds to emotional sounds in the background? We tested whether EEG measures associated with emotion and workload could help distinguish these effects.

Study design

ParticipantsMain taskDistractors
12 adultsOne- or two-digit additionNegative, neutral, or positive sounds

We recorded mobile EEG and compared frontal alpha asymmetry and a frontal theta-to-parietal alpha workload measure across the six conditions.

What we found

  • Positive sounds elicited different frontal alpha asymmetry under low and high working-memory load.
  • Other differences across distractor types and workload conditions were inconclusive in this pilot sample.

Watch the project presentation

References (21)
  1. Cromheeke, S., and Mueller, S. C. (2014). Probing emotional influences on cognitive control: an ALE meta-analysis of cognition emotion interactions. Brain Struct Funct 219, 995–1008. 10.1007/s00429-013-0549-z
  2. Gray, J. R., Braver, T. S., and Raichle, M. E. (2002). Integration of emotion and cognition in the lateral prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(6), 4115-4120.
  3. Pessoa, L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nature reviews neuroscience 9(2), 148-158.
  4. Ihme, K., Unni, A., Zhang, M., Rieger, J. W., and Jipp, M. (2018) Recognizing frustration of drivers from face video recordings and brain activation measurements with functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12, 327. 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00327
  5. Seleznov, I., Zyma, I., Kiyono, K., Tukaev S., Popov, A., Chernykh, M., and Shpenkov, O. (2019) Detrended fluctuation, coherence, and spectral power analysis of activation rearrangement in EEG dynamics during cognitive workload. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 270. 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00270
  6. Okon-Singer, H., Hendler, T., Pessoa, L., and Shackman, A. J. (2015). The neurobiology of emotion-cognition interactions: Fundamental questions and strategies for future research. Front Hum Neurosci 9, 58. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00058
  7. Zinchenko, A., Kotz, S. A., Schröger, E., and Kanske, P. (2020). Moving towards dynamics: Emotional modulation of cognitive and emotional control. Int J Psychophysiol 147, 193–201. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.10.018
  8. Morawetz, C., Riedel, M. C., Salo, T., Berboth, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Laird, A. R., et al. (2020). Multiple large-scale neural networks underlying emotion regulation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 116, 382–395. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.001
  9. Dolcos, F., and Denkova, E. (2014). Current emotion research in cognitive neuroscience: Linking enhancing and impairing effects of emotion on cognition. Emotion Review 6, 362–375. 10.1177/1754073914536449
  10. Iordan, A. D., Dolcos, S., and Dolcos, F. (2013). Neural signatures of the response to emotional distraction: A review of evidence from brain imaging investigations. Front Hum Neurosci 7, 200. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00200
  11. Wessa, M., Heissler, J., Schönfelder, S., and Kanske, P. (2013). Goal-directed behavior under emotional distraction is preserved by enhanced task-specific activation. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 8, 305–312. 10.1093/scan/nsr098
  12. Shafer, A. T., Matveychuk, D., Penney, T., O’Hare, A. J., Stokes, J., and Dolcos, F. (2012). Processing of emotional distraction is both automatic and modulated by attention: evidence from an event-related fMRI investigation. J Cogn Neurosci 24, 1233–1252. 10.1162/jocn_a_00206
  13. Ahern, G. L., and Schwartz, G. E. (1985). Differential lateralization for positive and negative emotion in the human brain: EEG spectral analysis. Neuropsychologia 23, 745–755. 10.1016/0028-3932(85)90081-8
  14. Briesemeister, B. B., Tamm, S., Heine, A., and Jacobs, A. M. (2013). Approach the good, withdraw from the bad—A review on frontal alpha asymmetry measures in applied psychological research. PSYCH 04, 261–267. 10.4236/psych.2013.43A039
  15. Smith, E. E., Reznik, S. J., Stewart, J. L., and Allen, J. J. B. (2017). Assessing and conceptualizing frontal EEG asymmetry: An updated primer on recording, processing, analyzing, and interpreting frontal alpha asymmetry. Int J Psychophysiol 111, 98–114. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.11.005
  16. Gevins, A., Smith, M. E., McEvoy, L., and Yu, D. (1997). High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: Effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice. Cereb Cortex 7, 374–385. 10.1093/cercor/7.4.374
  17. Brouwer, A.-M., Hogervorst, M. A., van Erp, J. B. F., Heffelaar, T., Zimmerman, P. H., and Oostenveld, R. (2012). Estimating workload using EEG spectral power and ERPs in the n-back task. J Neural Eng 9, 45008. 10.1088/1741-2560/9/4/045008
  18. Joseph, D. L., Chan, M. Y., Heintzelman, S. J., Tay, L., Diener, E., and Scotney, V. S. (2020). The manipulation of affect: A meta-analysis of affect induction procedures. Psychol Bull 146, 355–375. 10.1037/bul0000224
  19. Gado, S., Lingelbach, K., Bui, M., Rieger, J. W., and Vukelić, M. (2021). “Real-time feedback of subjective affect and working memory load based on neurophysiological activity,” in The International Conference, HCI International 2021, Washington DC, USA, July 24-29, 2021, Proceedings (in-press). Springer.
  20. Lingelbach, K., Gado, S., Vukelić, M, and Rieger, J. W. (2021). “What I feel and what I say: Decoding neurophysiological correlates of cognitive and affective states,” in The 3rd International Neuroergonomics Conference, Munich, Germany, September 11-16, 2021, (submitted).
  21. Bradley, M. M., and Lang, P. J. (2007). The International Affective Digitized Sounds (IADS-2): Affective ratings of sounds and instruction manual. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, Tech. Rep. B-3.